Skip to main content

India and the conflict in Gaza: Moralistic concerns or National interest?

India’s studied silence over the killings in Gaza last month has come under severe criticism. While the Indian government has termed its stand as ‘neutral’, many see this as plain indifference driven by strategic interests. By not passing a parliamentary resolution condemning the massacre of innocent women and children in Gaza, the Indian government’s response to the conflict is being viewed through an ideological prism. With its right-wing and majoritarian leanings, the government has been accused of overlooking the human tragedy unleashed by Israeli forces. Questions like – Is the Indian response driven by a real-politik realization of deep strategic ties with Israel or Is India looking to forsake its long-standing relations with Palestine, surround the debate on this issue. A larger question that needs to be addressed is whether international relations leave any scope for human and moralistic considerations, even as national interest continues to play an important role in determining how nation-states deal with each other.

Never before has the Israel-Palestine conflict generated popular curiosity in India, in the manner in which a clear public outcry can be seen over the present conflict. Especially on social media, Indians have been at the forefront in expressing their concern about the crisis. Images of civilian suffering in the conflict have bombarded social media forums, leading to protests – thereby an emergent public opinion posited against Israel. Social media has played an extremely important role in mobilizing public opinion on the issue – as people find it difficult to decide between the right and the wrong. Some religious organizations in the country have even approached Prime Minister Modi insisting that he take a firm stand on the issue. What is it that India shies away from in speaking against Israeli occupation of Palestinian land?

There seem to be no easy answers as to why India has taken a balanced stand on this issue. Or is it that the Indian government is wary of openly coming out in support of either of the two sides? Since India has always been a supporter of the Palestinian cause, the current Indian response is being termed as a radical foreign policy shift owing to the ideological underpinnings of the new government. Over the last two decades, the Indo-Israel relationship has been strengthened with cooperation in the spheres of military and intelligence. Israel is an important military partner for India apart from enhanced cooperation in science and technology, agriculture and economy (Saffron shift in India’s Foreign policy on Israel-Gaza conflict - July 31 2014)[1]. Is India then looking to stronger ties with Israel due to which it does not wish to land itself in a precarious position over the issue? More importantly, is this the outcome of a government that shares ideological affinity with Israel? In such a scenario, how do we envision India’s stand on this intractable conflict in the future?

Observing the discourse on social media in the past few weeks, one can clearly make sense of a strong, nationalist, pro-Israel lobby in India. This group not only endorses but is all praise for Israel’s overtly nationalistic response in defence of its territory and sovereignty. According to this lobby, India should take a lesson or two from Israel – especially in the context of Pakistan inflicted terrorism. Popular opinion in India remains deeply divided on the issue. The pro-Palestine opinion takes a humanistic view of the conflict with empathy for the plight of civilians in Gaza. Israel for them is an occupier and hence deserves no sympathy. On the other hand, those who view India as a victim of Pakistan sponsored terrorism defend Israeli actions from the lens of national interest. It is in this light that they are critical of India’s weak response to Pakistan backed terrorists, which they hope a strong and nationalistic Modi led government will be able to challenge. Thus, a polarized public perception has emerged in India – looking at the Gaza crisis from the prism of either humanity & moralism or from the perspective of challenges faced by the Indian state in terms of Kashmir and Pakistan. The Indian foreign policy response has been ridiculed as weak using this very analogy. The question then is which section of the Indian opinion is the government trying to appease?

At the most, the Indian response comes across as confused but diplomatic. Even after refusing to pass a resolution in its own parliament, India voted against Israel at the UN. In a statement issued by the Ministry of External Affairs on July 10, India expressed concerns at the escalating violence, but at the same time made a sharp reference to cross border terrorism in Israel. From the stand point of terrorism, India identifies with Israel and does not want to be seen as backing a terrorist group. Both India and Israel are important actors in the coalition against terrorism and both hold strong views about being surrounded in a hostile neighbourhood. India’s own stand on the conflict in Kashmir refrains her from taking moral high ground on human rights atrocities in Gaza. On the issue of Kashmir and human rights violation, India is already in the dock and faces immense criticism from Pakistan as well as international human rights agencies.

Many in India believe that the present government led by a supposed Hindu hardliner will support Israel in the long run since this BJP led government find an easy ideological, political and cultural alliance with Israel rather than Palestine. Faced with the common enemy of Islamic terrorism, Indo-Israel ties are only on the rise. However, it will not be easy for India to abandon support to the Palestine cause because of domestic political considerations (as a large Muslim community in the country is seething with anti-Israel sentiment) and its own strategic and diplomatic interests in West Asia. The current response is more of a balancing act as expressed in the statement by External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj who declined to take sides[2]. India realises the benefits of supporting Israel (by condemning Hamas backed terrorism) and being sympathetic to Palestine at the same time (by condemning the violence unleashed by Israel). Without any clear policy articulation, only time will tell what India chooses to follow - larger moral considerations or national interest?




[2] “We have diplomatic ties with both nations. Any discourteous reference to any friendly country can impact our relations with them.” – Statement by Indian External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Revisiting wounded souls in Pinjar

Film Review – Pinjar (The Skeleton) – 2003

Director: Chandra Prakash Dwivedi


Cast:Urmila Matondkar (Puro/Hamida), Manoj Bajpai (Rashid), Sanjay Suri (Ramchand), Kulbhushan Kharbanda (Mohanlal), Lillete Dubey (Mrs. Mohanlal), Sandali Sinha (Lajjo), Isha Koppikar (Rajjo), Priyanshu Chatterjee (Trilok)
Based on Amrita Pritam’s Punjabi novel “PINJAR” Violent bloodbath, massacres of scores of human beings and refugee exodus were the most powerful symbols of the partition of the Indian sub-continent. Chandra Prakash Dwivedi’s film Pinjar represents the pain of the partition which engulfed three communities of India – the Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs. The film is also the story of a family, essentially the journey of the daughter of the family – Puro (UrmilaMatondkar in a major role) and her transformation to Hamida, her loss of identity and her agony. Pinjar is set in 1946 which marked the pre-partition era. Even before the country was divided into two parts, communal rage had spread all over an…

To Be or Not to Be ... Natsamrat

How often do you get to watch a movie that is not just a three hour entertainment package delivered to you on screen, but more than that? A movie that is a lived experience for its audience. I watched one such movie recently. Of late, the Marathi movie industry has been producing some excellent stuff, with innovative story lines and bold characters. Director Mahesh Manjrekar has been at the forefront of this cinematic revolution. Anytime, I venture in to watch a Marathi movie, my expectations automatically turn sky high because Marathi cinema, over the past few years has actually spoilt its viewers for choice. Last week I watched the Nana Patekar starrer Natasamrat which means 'King of the theatre scene'. Through its trailers and subject, one feels that Natsamrat is a typically serious, art-oriented movie. And that it is. But deep inside, the movie offers a very enchanting story of an old man who once reigned the theatre scene in Maharashtra. With this, it offers ample life le…

How can the Indian 'right' do it 'right'?

The political atmosphere in the country is visibly charged up after the turn of events in Karnataka last week after the declaration of results. Though there were predictions of a hung assembly in the state, the expected results which saw the BJP fall short of merely 8 seats from a clean majority, took the nation by surprise. What unleashed thereafter was a drama that no one was quite ready for. Things are only heating up for the General Elections 2019 and social media is full of advice on what and how the 'right' side of the political spectrum can prepare to face for what appears to be a mammoth task in front of them -winning the magic number of 272 seats in the Lok Sabha. The political discourse now is bereft of all decency and morality since 2019 is now a war that each side wants to win desperately. However, what transpired in Karnataka is being seen by many as a warning sign for the BJP to not take 2019 for granted. Tons and tons of advice poured in for the right-wing on T…